• Welcome to MEDVERSATION®
  • Log InREGISTER
  • SITE HELP
  • MEDVERSATION® is brought to you by Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.

Coccidioidomycosis Overview and Associated Risk Factors

This section discusses the etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and description of coccidioidomycosis infection and associated manifestations, as well as diagnosis and treatment options.

Etiology and Taxonomy of Coccidioidomycosis

Coccidioidomycosis (also called San Joaquin Valley Fever, Valley Fever, Cocci, Desert Rheumatism) is a mycotic fungal disease caused by 2 nearly identical species of the genus Coccidioides, specifically Coccidioides immitis and Coccidioides posadasii1021,  1067,  1044  and are referred to as the Californian and non-Californian species, respectively.1021  The Coccidioides species fall under the class Ascomycetes, and are genetically related to the pathogenic dimorphic fungi Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis,1044  and Paracoccidioides.1067 

Coccidioidomycosis Life Cycle

Coccidioides species are dimorphic fungi with a saprophytic phase and a parasitic phase Fig.147.1067,  1020  During the saprophytic phase the fungus lives in the soil as mold, extracts nutrients from organic breakdown and decay, and develops branching hyphae.1021,  1067,  1020  The fungus reproduces asexually through disjoining of the hyphae into small (2.5-5 μm in width; 3-6 μm in length), hardy, barrel-shaped arthroconidia.1021,  1067,  1044,  1020  These easily become airborne if the soil is disturbed (e.g., wind, construction, earthquakes, and excavation), and because of their microscopic size, arthroconidia can readily reach the terminal alveoli of the lung if inhaled.1021,  1067,  1044,  1023  Once in the lung of the mammalian host (animal or human), the fungus undergoes a morphologic transformation into the parasitic phase of its life cycle.

Arthroconidia transform into thick-walled spherules (pathognomonic for coccidioidomycosis) that contain hundreds to thousands of uninucleate endospores. Spherules can grow up to 30 mm in diameter and, if the host infection is uncontrolled, they ultimately septate into progeny uninucleate endospores, each capable of producing up to thousands of new spherules.1021,  1044,  1020  The primary route for contracting coccidioidomycosis is through inhalation of Coccidioides latent dust; coccidioidomycosis is not a contagious disease, and reports of human-to-human spread are extremely rare.1021 

Figure 147 – Coccidioides Life Cycle


Kaiser, GE. Life cycle of the dimorphic fungus Coccidioides immitis. 1998. Available at: http://faculty.ccbcmd.edu/courses/bio141/lecguide/unit3/fungi/u1fig39a.html. Accessed July 2, 2009.

11193

Figure 148 – Life Cycle of Coccidioides Immitis

VIEW LARGER IMAGE

Figure 2, Page 16, PLoS Med (Public Library of Science) 2005;2:(1):e2-e5 is used with permission of the Public Library of Science.

1021

Epidemiology of Coccidioidomycosis

The epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis, including its geographic distribution and population incidence, is described in the following sections.

Distribution

The Coccidioides species are found in the soil of the southwestern United States, Mexico, and Central and South America1021,  1067  between the latitudes of 42° North and 42° South.1044  This semi-arid area corresponds to a region referred to as the Lower Sonoran Life Zone. In the United States, coccidioidomycosis endemic areas include, most notably, western Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, southern Nevada, southern Utah, and central and southern California.1021,  1044,  1023  (See Fig.149.)

Figure 149 – Geographic Distribution of Coccidioidomycosis

VIEW LARGER IMAGE

Figure 1, Page 15, PLoS Med (Public Library of Science) 2005;2:(1):e2–e5 is used with permission of the Public Library of Science.

1021

Incidence

Over the past 15 years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of coccidioidomycosis cases leading some to propose that the disease is re-emerging or becoming an epidemic.1023  Outbreaks have been reported in California 1056,  1100,  1109,  1072  and Arizona 1046,  1058  during this period. However, the increase in documented cases of coccidioidomycosis may be due to several factors: surveillance for coccidioidomycosis in Arizona before 1995 was based on voluntary physician reporting, lack of clear case definition for coccidioidomycosis until 1995, and lack of mandatory reporting in Arizona until 1997.1023 

In 1995, it was estimated that there were approximately 100,000 coccidioidomycosis infections per year.1115  By 2005, Galgiani, et al, estimated that 150,000 coccidioidomycosis infections were occurring annually, with the increase attributed to the rising populations in Arizona and California.1075  Migration, new construction, and climatic changes (exceptionally rainy conditions followed by a drought) are all considered factors leading to the increase in coccidioidomycosis infections.1021,  1067,  1023 

Park, et al, 2005 (Environmental Factor Study)

In 2005, Park, et al,1023  published a retrospective review regarding the incidence of disease and hospitalizations related to coccidioidomycosis in Arizona. The authors analyzed the National Electronic Telecommunications System for Surveillance and the Arizona Hospital Discharge Database from 1998 to 2001. To calculate the denominators for rate calculations, they used 2000 US Census data as well as estimates for noncensus years and made adjustments for the annual statewide winter migration of 300,000 visitors. Furthermore, to examine the factors related to the increase in coccidioidomycosis infections, the authors conducted 2 additional studies. Specifically, they completed a cohort study of case patients to determine whether differences in recalled exposures or host factors were associated with periods of high vs. low incidence. They also conducted a climatologic study to examine whether changes in climatic or environmental conditions might have been related to the increased incidence in coccidioidomycosis infections in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Their findings illustrated that the annual incidence of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona increased from 33 cases/100,000 population in 1998 to 43 cases/100,000 population in 2001, a statistically significant increase (P<0.001). Likewise, the number of hospitalizations due to coccidioidomycosis increased from 1.4/100,000 population in 1998 to 11.8/100,000 during 2001, which was statistically significant (P<0.001). In 2001, individuals 65 years of age or older composed 34% of all hospitalized patients with the highest hospitalization rate at 29 cases/100,000 in the population as well as the highest overall incidence with 79 cases/100,000 in the population.

Park and co-authors’ cohort study indicated that known risk factors for coccidioidomycosis infection were not statistically more prevalent during periods of high vs. low incidence. Risk factors examined included the type of exposure during the month prior to illness (e.g., dust storm), diabetes, being immunocompromised, taking immunosuppressant medications, and/or smoking at illness onset.

The climatologic study found that drought indices, wind, mean temperature, dust, and rainfall were all statistically significant climatic and environmental variables. Using Poisson regression modeling, Park, et al constructed a final prediction model that explained 75% of the variance (R2 =0.75). The variables included in the model were average temperature during the previous 3 months, cumulative rainfall during the last 7 months, and proportion of rainfall during the last 2 months divided by rainfall during the previous 7 months. See Fig.150 below.

Figure 150 – Relationship Between Environmental and Climatic Variables and Coccidioidomycosis Cases in Maricopa County (1998-2001)

VIEW LARGER IMAGE

Table 1, Page 1986, J Infect Dis. 2005;191(11):1981-1987 is used with permission from the University of Chicago Press.

1023

Park, et al, demonstrated a seasonal pattern of coccidioidomycosis in select groups, but did not find outbreaks to be related to population characteristics, exposure, or comorbidities. Likewise, adjusting for the annual elderly winter visitor migration did not account for outbreaks. Geographic Information Systems analysis revealed high age-adjusted coccidioidomycosis rates in areas undergoing a large amount of construction activity and development in the outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. Fig.151 One proposed explanation for this geographic distribution was that these areas also have large retirement communities not previously exposed to coccidioidomycosis. Overall, these investigators found that climatic variables, including hot, dry conditions, had the strongest association with incidence, and that an important component of the epidemic in Arizona is the large disease burden of the elderly population.

Figure 151 – Average Annual Incidence of Coccidioidomycosis in Maricopa County, Arizona (1998-2001)


Figure 3, Page 1983, J Infect Dis. 2005;191(11):1981-1987 is used with permission from the University of Chicago Press.

1023

Risk Factors Associated With the Development of Coccidioidomycosis

Age is a significant risk factor for developing coccidioidomycosis.1021,  1044  The highest risk appears to be in the elderly who recently moved to endemic areas such as Arizona.1021,  1044,  1092  Other risk factors for developing severe, disseminated coccidioidomycosis include immunosuppression either as a result of disease or treatment with immunosuppressant medications.1067,  1044,  1075,  1050,  1105  Coccidioidomycosis is also frequently a complication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.1067,  1044,  1020,  1073,  1045,  1094,  1043,  1123  However, decreased incidence of coccidioidomycosis in HIV-infected individuals has been noted since the advent of highly active anti-retroviral therapy.1044  Solid organ transplant patients are also at increased risk,1067,  1044,  1075  as are those with diabetes.1021,  1050  Gender is also a risk factor, with males having a 3.5- to 5-fold increased risk for disseminated coccidioidomycosis compared to females.1067 

Although males are typically at higher risk for developing disseminated coccidioidomycosis, pregnancy has long been associated with increased susceptibility for developing coccidioidomycosis, including severe, disseminated disease.1067,  1020  Research has shown that this increased risk for disseminated disease is lower than previously reported but is still higher than that found in the general female population of childbearing years.1054  It has been theorized that the increased risk for severe coccidioidomycosis in pregnant women is secondary to the immunosuppression that accompanies gestation. However, another proposed mechanism is that progesterone and 17 β-estradiol stimulate the growth of the spherule/endospore phase of coccidioidomycosis.1067  This research has only been completed in vitro , and there are no reports that these hormones induce stimulation of fungal growth in vivo . Regardless of the explanatory theory, one consistent finding is that there exists an increased risk of developing disseminated coccidioidomycosis for females who acquire their primary infection during pregnancy, compared to those who were previously infected.1067 

According to Cox and Magee, “In no other mycosis is the racial predisposition toward developing severe, disseminated disease more conclusive.”1077  Specifically, African-Americans, Filipinos, Mexican-Americans, Native Americans, and Asians appear to be increasingly susceptible.1067,  1044,  1020,  1075  One criticism of early research on race and coccidioidomycosis was the failure to control for a major confounding variable: occupation. Members of these minority groups more frequently have occupations such as ranching, farming, or other outdoor vocations that increase their exposure to soil and dust, thereby increasing their risk of coccidioidomycosis infection. However, research following recent outbreaks, where exposure was less likely biased by occupation, has yielded findings supporting the race and infections risk association.1067 

The risk of occurrence and dissemination of coccidioidomycosis is greater in immunocompromised patients than non-immunocompromised patients. Immunocompromised patients, including those with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders and those with other immunocompromising conditions, also have a higher risk of coccidioidomycosis whether or not they are taking immunosuppressants. For instance, infection and dissemination risk is greater in human immunodeficiency virus, Hodgkin’s disease, and solid organ transplant patients than in non-immunocompromised patients.1108,  1065,  1053,  1045  Cohen, et al, examined the incidence of coccidioidomycosis in renally­compromised patients over a 10-year period in Arizona and found that this group had a 6-fold increased risk of developing symptomatic coccidioidomycosis compared to individuals who were not undergoing dialysis.1065  Disseminated coccidioidomycosis in the renal transplant patient is rare (<1% of infections), but with a high mortality rate in the first year following diagnosis.1069,  1110,  1114  In contrast, mortality in coccidioidal meningitis in the non-immunosuppressed host varies between 19%­30% over a period of several years.1121,  1089 

Dissemination of coccidioidomycosis generally occurs in approximately 1% of patients and is sometimes thought to be a direct consequence of cellular immunity suppression.1069,  1071,  1099  There is 1 case in the medical literature describing a patient with Crohn’s disease (CD) who developed coccidioidomycosis and was not receiving immunosuppressive medications.1096  Although it is generally assumed that coccidioidomycosis does not infect the GI tract, CD results in the suppression of cellular immunity and could be a source of immunosuppression leading to disseminated coccidioidomycosis.1071,  1095 

Clinical Manifestationsof Coccidioidomycosis

Coccidioidomycosis presents as a wide spectrum of illness, ranging from asymptomatic primary pulmonary infection that resolves without treatment to severe disseminated disease that can result in death. In general, there are 4 categories of coccidioidomycosis:

  1. Primary Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis

  2. Valley Fever Complex

  3. Chronic Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis

  4. Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis

Each category has different treatment and prognostic implications.1067 

Primary Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis

Early pioneering epidemiologic studies by C. E. Smith are credited with determining that approximately 60% of primary infections with Coccidioides are asymptomatic and only detectable through conversion of skin-test reactivity.1113,  1067,  1044,  1021,  1075  Almost all patients who acquire coccidioidomycosis, including those who are initially asymptomatic, resolve their infection and have lifelong immunity.1021,  1044,  1075  Nevertheless, there have been reports of reactivation in severely immunocompromised patients such as organ transplant recipients.1067 

The remaining 40% of primary pulmonary infections exhibit mild flu-type symptoms, such as a limited acute or subacute pneumonia, that become apparent approximately 1 to 3 weeks post-infection.1075  Common symptoms include fever, chills, pleuritic chest pain, cough, headache, fatigue, arthralgia, and anorexia.1067,  1044,  1020  This type of presentation is often indistinguishable from a bacterial or other infection unless lab testing is performed, specifically, coccidioidal serologic testing or fungal culture.1075  Single or multiple pulmonary infiltrates are typically noted on chest radiographs and are frequently hilar or basal in location. However, atelectasis, hilar adenopathy, and pleural effusions occur in a minority of patients.1020  Ten to 30% of patients also develop an erythematous rash, usually within the first few days of clinical illness, that spontaneously resolves shortly thereafter in most cases. Termed toxic erythema, this rash typically covers the trunk and lower extremities and is attributed to the acute febrile illness.1067,  1020 

Valley Fever Complex

Valley Fever or Valley Fever Complex occurs in approximately 5% of all primary infections and results in a combination of pulmonary symptoms with cutaneous evidence of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. Specifically, erythema nodosum and erythema multiforme typify Valley Fever Complex and are the principal manifestations, though arthralgias (Desert Rheumatism) and conjunctivitis may also occur.1067,  1044  Valley Fever Complex typically occurs more often in females and is usually associated with a benign outcome.1044 

Chronic Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis

It has been estimated that 5% to 10% of primary coccidioidomycosis infections develop into chronic pulmonary coccidioidomycosis.1067,  1044  Manifestations of chronic pulmonary coccidioidomycosis include progressive pneumonia, miliary disease, pulmonary nodules, or pulmonary cavitation.1067  Chronic pulmonary coccidioidomycosis typically presents with a single pulmonary nodule that is benign and often difficult to distinguish from malignancy. Fig.152 Multiple or multilocular nodules can occur as well. In addition, pulmonary nodules may cavitate. The majority of nodules are asymptomatic and spontaneously resolve, though some patients develop chronic progressive pulmonary involvement, including symptoms of cough, chest pain, hemoptysis, weight loss, and dyspnea that may continue for years.1067,  1044  In these exceptional cases, radiographic findings include biapical fibronodular lesions, multiple cavities, and inflammatory infiltrates.1067 

Figure 152 – Coccidioidomycosis Pulmonary Nodule


National Library of Medicine. Coccidioidomycosis: chest X-ray. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/imagepages/1600.htm. Accessed July 18, 2008.

1025

Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis

Dissemination results when an infection spreads outside the thoracic cavity.1044  Rates of primary coccidioidomycosis developing into disseminated coccidioidomycosis vary from 0.5% for Caucasians to several fold higher in those of African or Filipino ancestry.1075  African and Filipino ancestry, males, pregnant females, and the immunocompromised have an increased risk of dissemination.1067,  1020  Furthermore, dissemination rate is also dependent upon exposure, with those experiencing greater exposure (e.g., after an earthquake or dust storm) manifesting higher incidence.1067 

Dissemination typically occurs early in the disease course and may present in the absence of clinical or radiologic findings indicative of former pulmonary infection. Exceptions, however, have been demonstrated, and dissemination can be acute, subacute, or chronic. Extrapulmonary infection can occur throughout the body, except in the GI tract.1096  Affected areas include the skin and subcutaneous tissues, bone, lymph nodes, spleen, kidneys, liver, meninges, or pleura.1067  Skin manifestations can include wart-like nodules, lesions, papules, verrucous plaques, abscess, pustules, and sinus tracts.1075,  1026  Skin and subcutaneous lesions occur in greater than 65% of disseminated coccidioidomycosis cases.1067  Bone involvement can include single and multiple lesions in the long bones, spine, hands, feet, and skull. Synovial involvement is evident through arthritic pain and joint swelling, particularly in the ankles and knees.1020 

Coccidioidal meningitis presents in 30%­50% of disseminated coccidioidomycosis cases, with affected patients typically presenting with headaches and decreased mental acuity.1067,  1044  The meninges may be the only site of extrapulmonary disease in some patients, and death is inevitable, usually within 2 years, despite treatment.1067  Single extrapulmonary lesions, except those in the meninges, typically denote a favorable prognosis. Overall mortality rate is greater than 50% in those with multifocal dissemination, and death occurs as quickly as 3 to 4 months in those with acute miliary dissemination.

Diagnosis of Coccidioidomycosis

Diagnosis can be made through a variety of methods that demonstrate the characteristic endosporulating spherules in exudate, tissue, and sputum; in specimens that culture Coccidioides immitis; or by serologic testing.1101,  1020  Chest radiograph and bone scan cannot distinguish coccidioidomycosis from other pulmonary diseases. Therefore, these methods are not useful in rendering a definitive diagnosis but may be useful in following disease progression and determining prognosis after a confirmatory diagnosis has been made via another method.1020 

Culturing infected samples is an expedient method for diagnosing coccidioidomycosis and may yield positive results when histologic and cytologic results are negative. 1020,  1044  Coccidioides species grow quickly at 37°C on the proper media.1044  However, cultures are frequently negative in acute pulmonary coccidioidomycosis.1068  Respiratory secretions yield better results than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood cultures. CSF cultures are positive roughly 33% of the time, and blood cultures are typically negative except in severe cases of immunosuppression with significant pulmonary involvement.1020  Another disadvantage is that cultures require several weeks for speciation and final reporting.1078  Finally, the CDC lists Coccidioides species as Select Agents; hence, their growth in culture requires secure and contained handling as they are considered a biohazard.1020,  1044,  1075 

Histopathologic methods, by staining with Gomori-methenamine-silver, hematoxylin-eosin, or Papanicolaou, are a sensitive way of identifying small numbers of spherules, although these methods can delay diagnosis and can rarely be used in CSF analysis.1020,  1044  The Papanicolaou stain is especially useful in detecting spherules in sputum or other respiratory samples.1044 

Skin tests are no longer commercially available in the United States.1084,  1026  Moreover, these tests are typically not sensitive in the first few weeks after Coccidioides exposure. They also have limited usefulness because they measure exposure, but not active infection. Skin tests have decreased reactivity in the immunocompromised, as well as in immunocompetent patients with advanced disease. In addition, positive reactions designate exposure, whereas negative reactions do not rule it out. Serial testing also decreases the probability of yielding a positive reaction.1020 

Serologic testing is the most commonly used method of diagnosing coccidioidomycosis.1044  It is recommended when infection is suspected as well as after detection via culture or microscopy because it allows monitoring of disease progression.1020  There are various serologic tests available including tube precipitin (TP), complement fixation (CF), immunodiffusion with heated coccidioidin (IDTP), and latex agglutination (LA).1028  These tests measure immunoglobulin G (IgG) and/or immunoglobulin M (IgM). During the early stages of newly acquired infection or dissemination, IgM antibodies are produced and detectable typically by the second week. Decline in IgM production usually begins approximately 6­weeks,post-symptom onset and ends at approximately the same time IgG antibody production peaks.1020,  1028 

The TP test was developed over 50 years ago by Smith1113  and is associated with an IgM response, which is indicative of new or relapsing infection.1028  The IDTP and LA tests measure IgM as well and have largely replaced the TP test. The IDTP test correlates well with the TP test, whereas the LA test renders more false positives.1068,  1028  Modifications to IDTP (e.g., counterimmunoelectrophoresis) yield antigen-antibody reactions within 2 hours vs. TP or IDTP, which require 18 to 24 hours to develop.1101 

CF testing detects IgG antibody production and is considered by many to be the most important serologic test for coccidioidomycosis.1068,  1028  IgG titers are related to disease severity. Therefore, CF testing is not only useful for disease detection, but also for determining disease severity (a rising titer between 1:16 and 1:32 is associated with a high rate of dissemination) and measuring therapeutic response.1020,  1068,  1028  Disadvantages to CF testing are that it is not useful in the early stages of detection, lacks specificity of low-titer results, and has decreased sensitivity in immunosuppressed patients.1068 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques for coccidioidal antigens allow coccidioidomycosis to be diagnosed in the early stages of disease before detection of IgM and IgG with complement fixation. A 33kDa antigen from a first-generation spherule of C immitis was cloned and purified. Research has demonstrated that this antigen is a more sensitive indicator of anti-coccidioidal antibodies in sera and CSF compared to antigens used in standard immunoassays.1020  For instance, Galgiani, et al,1079  used ELISA to detect antibodies against a 33kDa antigen in CSF of patients. This method yielded high positive predictive value (99%) and specificity (99%) as well as good negative predictive value (71%) and sensitivity (72%). Overall, the authors concluded that the 33kDa Coccidioides antigen measurement was a sensitive indicator of coccidioidal meningitis and provided useful information on clinical course.1079 

Polymerase chain reaction is a newer approach to detecting coccidioidomycosis that appears sensitive and rapid, although additional research is warranted.1020 

Treatment of Coccidioidomycosis

Coccidioidomycosis is a continuum of disease. At one end of the spectrum, coccidioidomycosis may result in asymptomatic infection, mild respiratory syndrome, or uncomplicated pneumonia that spontaneously resolves with supportive care. Conversely, coccidioidomycosis can result in progressive pulmonary destruction or disseminated lesions in other parts of the body, including the meninges. Consequently, management strategies need to be tailored and may vary considerably.1075,  1076 

Galgiani, et al, published thorough practice guidelines for coccidioidomycosis treatment1076  , and in 2005 published an updated version of these guidelines that was endorsed by the Infectious Disease Society of America.1075  For a comprehensive review of treatment options and standard of care treatment guidelines, the reader can review Galgianis’ publication,1075  but should also consult an infectious disease specialist when managing any risks or cases of infection. The products described in the following sections include only treatments approved by the FDA for coccidioidomycosis.

There are 2 classes of anti-fungal therapy used to treat coccidioidomycosis, the polyenes and the azoles.1075,  1021,  1044  The polyenes include amphotericin B with a typical dosage of 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg per day or alternate day administered intravenously (IV), and newer lipid amphotericin B formulations of 2.0 to 5.0 mg/kg, or greater, per day administered intravenously. The use of amphotericin can be limited by its toxicities and side effects including renal dysfunction, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, anemia, pyrexia, nausea, vomiting, and febrile reactions.1075,  1044,  1020  Therefore, amphotericin B is typically utilized in the treatment of severely ill, hospitalized patients and those who fail other anti-fungal treatment.1021  Amphotericin B lipid formulations may be used if the patient is intolerant to other forms.

Ketoconazole is an azole anti-fungal that is also indicated for the treatment of coccidioidomycosis. The recommended dosage of oral ketoconazole is 200 mg to 400 mg per day, and it must be taken for a minimum of 6 months for systemic infection. Common side effects include pruritis, abdominal pain, and nausea and vomiting. Serious but rare side effects include hepatotoxicity and anaphylaxis, and drug interactions may cause serious cardiovascular events such as ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia.1075 

Primary Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis

Smith, et al, are credited with determining that approximately 60% of primary infections with Coccidioides are asymptomatic, only detectable through a conversion of skin-test reactivity, and that the majority of primary pulmonary Coccidioides infections spontaneously resolve with supportive care alone.1113,  1021  Therefore, they suggest that no anti-fungal therapy may be warranted in many cases. However, these authors also suggest that the clinician should routinely follow-up with the infected patient every 3 to 6 months over a period of 2 years if no therapy is given. During these visits, it is recommended that repeat radiographic studies be completed to either demonstrate resolution or to identify illness exacerbations, such as pulmonary or extrapulmonary complications, as quickly as possible.1075 

Despite published treatment guidelines1075,  1076  that no therapy is required for most cases of primary pulmonary coccidioidomycosis and that treatment should be reserved for those with persistent primary illness, chronic pulmonary disease, or extrapulmonary dissemination, physicians are increasingly prescribing azole anti-fungal therapy for patients with primary pulmonary coccidioidomycosis infection.1021,  1075,  1044 

Supportive care is the standard of care when treating primary pulmonary infection. However, there are special circumstances that warrant therapy with an oral azole anti-fungal at dosages of 200 mg to 400 mg per day for a period of typically 3 to 6 months.1075  Principal among these are immunosuppressed patients and patients with comorbid conditions (e.g., cardiopulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus) that decrease their ability to handle pulmonary infection. Pregnancy, especially with coccidioidomycosis diagnosis in the third trimester or immediately postpartum, is another special case.1075  With pregnancy, amphotericin B is the treatment of choice because azoles are likely teratogenic.1075,  1057  In addition, the CDC recommends that women infected with human immunodeficiency virus use effective birth control measures when receiving azole therapy for coccidioidomycosis.1057  Finally, patients determined to have the most severe primary pulmonary infections as well as those of Filipino or African-American descent (because of the potentially high risk for dissemination) should be considered for treatment.1075 

Chronic Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis

Treatment recommendations vary for cases of chronic pulmonary coccidioidomycosis based upon severity, chronicity, extent of the pneumonia, the presence or absence of pulmonary nodule(s), whether cavitation has occurred, and whether the cavity is asymptomatic, symptomatic, and/or ruptured. In cases of diffuse pneumonia with bilateral reticulonodular or miliary infiltrates, amphotericin B or high-dose azole therapy is recommended. If deterioration is rapid or significant hypoxia is present, then amphotericin B is frequently used as the initial therapy. Duration of therapy may be several weeks. Thereafter, amphotericin B treatment may be discontinued and treatment with an oral azole anti-fungal initiated. Oral azole anti-fungal treatment can be used for at least 6 months for systemic mycosis.1075 

According to Galgiani,1075  anti-fungal therapy is unnecessary in cases where there is a stable pulmonary nodule. Likewise, the Infectious Diseases Society of America advises that if the lesion is resected and diagnosis rendered from the excised tissue, anti-fungal therapy is not recommended. Enlargement of the nodule warrants re-evaluation and consideration for therapy if active infection is found.1075 

Asymptomatic pulmonary cavities are often benign and do not warrant treatment. There is no evidence that anti-fungal therapy has a beneficial impact on asymptomatic coccidioidal cavities. Cavities should be monitored over time. Resection is warranted in cases where the cavity becomes progressively enlarged, is immediately adjacent to the pleura, or if it is still detectable after 2 years.1075 

Symptomatic cavities are often treated with azole anti-fungal treatment, although symptom recurrence upon treatment discontinuation is common. Treatment for several weeks with an oral antibacterial is warranted if a bacterial superinfection is present. These therapies, however, typically do not result in cavity closure. Hence, resection may be recommended, as opposed to chronic or intermittent anti-fungal therapy, in cases with low surgical risk to definitively resolve the problem.1075 

Coccidioidal cavity rupture into the pleural space rarely occurs but may necessitate surgical closure by lobectomy with decortication. Anti-fungal therapy is recommended, especially for those with delayed diagnosis or comorbid disease. Amphotericin B or oral azole anti-fungal treatment pre-operatively and/or chest tube with drainage without surgery may also be considered in these cases.1075 

Disseminated (Extrapulmonary) Coccidioidomycosis

According to a review by Galgiani,1075  treatment of disseminated coccidioidomycosis depends on whether there are single or multiple extrapulmonary nodules, miliary dissemination, and meningeal vs. no meningeal involvement. Oral azole anti-fungal therapy is usually the initial therapy. If there is rapid worsening of lesions or if they are located in critical locations, amphotericin B is recommended as an alternative treatment. Combination therapy with an azole anti-fungal and amphotericin B has been tried in some of these patients, especially in cases of widespread infection or progressive disease with 1 of these therapies alone. However, there are no data to suggest this treatment approach is superior to monotherapy and, hypothetically, it might result in antagonism. Finally, surgery may be an important adjunctive treatment, but this should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.1075 

There is no therapy approved by the FDA for coccidioidal meningitis. Infectious disease specialists and guidelines1076  should be consulted for the most appropriate treatment as well as associated risks.

Prophylaxis Against Coccidioidomycosis

There is no therapy approved by the FDA for the prophylaxis of coccidioidomycosis in immunocompromised patients. However, a publication has reported results in organ transplant patients.1075  Prophylactic anti-fungal treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) patients living in an endemic area has been largely ineffective, but treatment is recommended for all HIV patients with clinically active coccidioidomycosis whose CD4+ lymphocyte counts are less than 250 cells/μL. Discontinuing therapy is reasonable in patients with higher CD4+ counts if there is clinical evidence of coccidioidal infection control.1075  Infectious disease specialists and guidelines should be consulted for the most appropriate treatment as well as associated risks. The CDC guidelines include recommendations for prophylaxis to prevent recurrence of coccidioidomycosis infection in individuals infected with HIV.1057 

Content on this page was last reviewed on March 05, 2009.

Content on this page was last changed on March 25, 2009.

References:

1020.  Vaz A, Pineda-Roman M, Thomas AR, Carlson RW. Coccidioidomycosis: an update. Hosp Pract (Minneap) . 1998;33(9):105-108, 113-115, 119-120.
1021.  Hector RF, Laniado-Laborin R. Coccidioidomycosis—a fungal disease of the Americas. PLoS Med. 2005;2(1):e2-e5, 15-18. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=545195=pdf . Accessed July 2, 2009.
1023.  Park BJ, Sigel K, Vaz V, et al. An epidemic of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona associated with climatic changes, 1998-2001. J Infect Dis . 2005;191(11):1981-1987 .
1026.  DiCaudo DJ. Coccidioidomycosis: a review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2006;55(6):929-942; quiz 943-945.
1028.  Pappagianis D, Zimmer BL. Serology of coccidioidomycosis. Clin Microbiol Rev . 1990;3(3):247-268 .
1043.  Ampel NM. Emerging disease issues and fungal pathogens associated with HIV infection. Emerg Infect Dis . 1996;2(2):109-116.
1044.  Ampel NM. Combating opportunistic infections: coccidioidomycosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother . 2004;5(2):255-261.
1045.  Ampel NM, Dols CL, Galgiani JN. Coccidioidomycosis during human immunodeficiency virus infection: results of a prospective study in a coccidioidal endemic area. Am J Med . 1993;94(3):235-240.
1046.  Ampel NM, Mosley DG, England B, Vertz PD, Komatsu K, Hajjeh RA. Coccidioidomycosis in Arizona: increase in incidence from 1990 to 1995. Clin Infect Dis . 1998;27(6):1528-1530.
1050.  Bergstrom L, Yocum DE, Ampel NM, et al. Increased risk of coccidioidomycosis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists. Arthritis Rheum . 2004;50(6):1959-1966.
1053.  Blair JE, Logan JL. Coccidioidomycosis in solid organ transplantation. Clin Infect Dis . 2001;33(9):1536-1544.
1054.  Caldwell JW, Arsura EL, Kilgore WB, Garcia AL, Reddy V, Johnson RH. Coccidioidomycosis in pregnancy during an epidemic in California. Obstet Gynecol . 2000;95(2):236-239.
1056.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: coccidioidomycosis—California, 1991-1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 1994;43(23):421-423. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00031453.htm . Accessed July 2, 2009.
1057.  1999 USPHS/IDSA Guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. US Public Health Service (USPHS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). MMWR Recomm Rep . 1999;48(RR-10):1-59, 61-66. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4810.pdf . Accessed July 2, 2009.
1058.  Centers for Disease Control. Increase in coccidioidomycosis—Arizona, 1998-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2003;52(6):109-112.
1065.  Cohen IM, Galgiani JN, Potter D, Ogden DA. Coccidioidomycosis in renal replacement therapy. Arch Intern Med . 1982;142(3):489-494.
1067.  Cox RA, Magee DM. Coccidioidomycosis: host response and vaccine development. Clin Microbiol Rev . 2004;17(4):804-839.
1068.  Davies SF, Sarosi GA. Role of serodiagnostic tests and skin tests in the diagnosis of fungal disease. Clin Chest Med . 1987;8(1):135-146.
1069.  Deresinski SC, Stevens DA. Coccidioidomycosis in compromised hosts. Experience at Stanford University Hospital. Medicine (Baltimore) . 1975;54(5):377-395.
1071.  Drutz DJ, Catanzaro A. Coccidioidomycosis. Part I. Am Rev Respir Dis . 1978;117(3):559-585.
1072.  Durry E, Pappagianis D, Werner SB, et al. Coccidioidomycosis in Tulare County, California, 1991: reemergence of an endemic disease. J Med Vet Mycol . 1997;35(5):321-326.
1073.  Fish DG, Ampel NM, Galgiani JN, et al. Coccidioidomycosis during human immunodeficiency virus infection. A review of 77 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) . 1990;69(6):384-391.
1075.  Galgiani JN, Ampel NM, Blair JE, et al. Coccidioidomycosis. Clin Infect Dis . 2005;41(9):1217-1223.
1076.  Galgiani JN, Ampel NM, Catanzaro A, Johnson RH, Stevens DA, Williams PL. Practice guideline for the treatment of coccidioidomycosis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis . 2000;30(4):658-661.
1077.  Galgiani JN, Catanzaro A, Cloud GA, et al. Comparison of oral fluconazole and itraconazole for progressive, nonmeningeal coccidioidomycosis. A randomized, double-blind trial. Mycoses Study Group. Ann Intern Med . 2000;133(9):676-686.
1078.  Galgiani JN, Grace GM, Lundergan LL. New serologic tests for early detection of coccidioidomycosis. J Infect Dis . 1991;163(3):671-674.
1079.  Galgiani JN, Peng T, Lewis ML, Cloud GA, Pappagianis D. Cerebrospinal fluid antibodies detected by ELISA against a 33-kDa antigen from spherules of Coccidioides immitis in patients with coccidioidal meningitis. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. J Infect Dis . 1996;173(2):499-502.
1084.  Johnson SM, Simmons KA, Pappagianis D. Amplification of coccidioidal DNA in clinical specimens by PCR. J Clin Microbiol . 2004;42(5):1982-1985.
1089.  Kelly P, Sievers M, Thompson R, Echols C. Coccidioidal meningitis: results of treatment in 22 patients. In: Ajello L, Coccidioidomycosis: Current Clinical and Diagnostic Status , New York, NY: Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation. 1977:239-251.
1092.  Leake JA, Mosley DG, England B, et al. Risk factors for acute symptomatic coccidioidomycosis among elderly persons in Arizona, 1996-1997. J Infect Dis . 2000;181(4):1435-1440.
1094.  McNeil MM, Ampel NM. Opportunistic coccidioidomycosis in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus: prevention issues and priorities. Clin Infect Dis . 1995;21(Suppl 1):S111-S113.
1095.  Meyers S, Sacher DB, Taub RN, Janowitz HD. Anergy to dinitrochlorobenzene and depression of T-lymphocytes in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Gut . 1976;17(11):911-915.
1096.  Moreno AJ, Bohman VD, Hoadley SD, Gunther JS, Weisman I. The occurrence of disseminated coccidioidomycosis in a patient with Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. . 1983;5(4):349-352.
1099.  Pappagianis D. Coccidioidomycosis. In Beeson P. Cecil Textbook of Medicine . 15th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1979:537-540.
1100.  Pappagianis D. Marked increase in cases of coccidioidomycosis in California: 1991, 1992, and 1993. Clin Infect Dis . 1994;19(Suppl 1):S14-S18.
1101.  Pappagianis D. Serologic studies in coccidioidomycosis. Semin Respir Infect . 2001;16(4):242-250.
1105.  Rahmani D, Mueller E, Bergstrom L, Lisse J, Vaz A. Coccidioidomycosis may be a risk for patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum . 2005;52(12). Abstract F60.
1108.  Rutala PJ, Smith JW. Coccidioidomycosis in potentially compromised hosts: the effect of immunosuppressive therapy in dissemination. Am J Med Sci . 1978;275(3):283-295.
1109.  Schneider E, Hajjeh RA, Spiegel RA, et al. A coccidioidomycosis outbreak following the Northridge, Calif, earthquake. JAMA . 1997;277(11):904-908.
1110.  Schroter GP, Bakshandeh K, Husberg BS, Well R 3rd. Coccidioidomycosis and renal transplantation. Transplantation . 1977;23(6):485-489.
1113.  Smith C, Beard R. Varieties of coccidioidal infection in relation to the epidemiology and control of the diseases. Am J Public Health Nations Health . 1946;36(12):1394-1402. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1624510=pdf . Accessed July 2, 2009.
1114.  Smithline N, Ogden D, Cohn A, Johnson K. Disseminated coccidioidomycosis in renal transplant patients. In Ajello L, Coccidioidomycosis: Current Clinical and Diagnostic Status . New York, NY: Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation. 1977:201-206.
1115.  Stevens DA. Coccidioidomycosis. N Engl J Med . 1995;332(16):1077-1082.
1121.  Winn W. Coccidioidal meningitis: a follow-up report. In: Proceedings of the Second Coccidioidomycosis Symposium , Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press; 1976:55-61.
1123.  Woods CW, McRill C, Plikaytis BD, et al. Coccidioidomycosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons in Arizona, 1994-1997: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. J Infect Dis . 2000;181(4):1428-1434.
11193.  Kaiser, GE. Life cycle of the dimorphic fungus Coccidioides immitis . 1998. Available at: http://faculty.ccbcmd.edu/courses/bio141/lecguide/unit3/fungi/u1fig39a.html . Accessed July 2, 2009.

Next Page: Invasive Candidiasis Overview and Associated Risk Factors »

Last Complete Site Update On: July 22, 2010